Features
|
FDD
|
TDD
|
Frame Stracture
|
10 ms radio frame, 1 ms sub frame
|
10 ms radio frame, 1 ms sub frame
|
Switching Points
|
N/A
|
5 ms or 10 ms periodicity
|
DL Control Channel
|
Can Schedule 1 DL and 1 UL subframe at a time
|
Can schedule 1 DL and multiple UL sub-frame at a time
|
UL Control Channel
|
Single Ack/Nack corresponding to 1DLsub frame
|
Ack/Nack corresponding to multiple DL sub frame
|
PRACH Preamble Format
|
0,1,2,3
|
0,1,2,3,4(Short RACH)
|
PRACH Configuration
| ||
Special Slot usage
|
N/A
|
DwPTS : RS, Data and Control
UpPTS : SRS and Short RACH
|
HARQ Timing
|
K = 4 (fixed)
DL : Async, UL :Sync
|
K = varying depending on Subframe Config
DL : Async, UL : Sync
|
Ack/Nack Feedback Mode | One Transmission one Ack/Nack | Bundling or Multiplexed |
SR/DCI 0 Timing | 4 ms | Varying |
DCI 0/PUSCH Timing | 4 ms | Varying |
System Information Variation
|
SIB1
|
< Subframe(UL/DL) Configuration >
< Special Subframe Length >
Special Subframe
Configuration
|
Length in Samples (Normal CP)
|
Length in OFDM Symbols (Normal CP)
| ||||
DwPTS
|
GP
|
UpPTS
|
DwPTS
|
GP
|
UpPTS
| |
0
|
6592 Ts
|
2560 Ts
|
3
|
10
|
1
| |
1
|
19760 Ts
|
2560 Ts
|
9
|
4
|
1
| |
2
|
21952 Ts
|
2560 Ts
|
10
|
3
|
1
| |
3
|
24144 Ts
|
2560 Ts
|
11
|
2
|
1
| |
4
|
26336 Ts
|
2560 Ts
|
12
|
1
|
1
| |
5
|
6592 Ts
|
5120 Ts
|
3
|
9
|
2
| |
6
|
19760 Ts
|
5120 Ts
|
9
|
3
|
2
| |
7
|
21952 Ts
|
5120 Ts
|
10
|
2
|
2
| |
8
|
24144 Ts
|
5120 Ts
|
11
|
1
|
2
|
Switching Points
PRACH Preamble Format
Refer to 36.211 5.7 Physical random access channel for the details.
RACH Configuration
Special Slot Usage
< RB Allocation on Special Subframe >
Refer to 36.213 7.1.7 Modulation order and transport block size determination for the details.
HARQ Timing
In case of FDD, it is pretty simple and obvious for UE to transmit HARQ ACK or NACK. UE start preparing the response as soon as it completes the decoding PDSCH and transmit it 4 ms (4 TTI) later. But in TDD, UE cannot transmit the response in such a fixed timing as in FDD. It has to wait until it gets the next chance for UL transmission and the next chance will be different depending on UL/DL configuration. Even when UE gets the chance to transmit the UL, it is may not always possible to transmit all the necessary response. For example, if UE gets too many DL subframe before the UL subframe, it will be difficult to transmit the all the reply in the UL transmission because PUCCH space is not big enough to accomodate all the HARQ ACK/NACK. So they came out with very complicated/confusing table as shown below to define HARQ response to cope with this kind of situation. In this section, I will explain how to interpret this table and figure out the exact HARQ response timing for each UL/DL configuration.
< ACK/NACK from UE for PDSCH >
Following table shows the Ack/Nack Transmission Timing from UE for the PDSCH it recieved.
Problem is how to interpret this table. Following shows how to interpret each raw of the table.
Case 1 : UL/DL Configuration 0
In case of UL/DL Configuration 0, Ack/Nack response timing for the PDSCH that is received by UE is transmitted according to the following rule.
How do you interpret this table and DL/UL correlation ?
It says
- UE transmit Ack/Nack at subframe 2,4,7,9
- At subframe 2, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 6 in previous SFN
- At subframe 4, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 0 in current SFN
- At subframe 7, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 1 in current SFN
- At subframe 9, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 5 in current SFN
Case 2 : UL/DL Configuration 1
In case of UL/DL Configuration 1, Ack/Nack response timing for the PDSCH that is received by UE is transmitted according to the following rule.
How do you interpret this table and DL/UL correlation ?
It says
- UE transmit Ack/Nack at subframe 2,3,7,8
- At subframe 2, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 5,6 in previous SFN
- At subframe 3, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 9 in previous SFN
- At subframe 7, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 0,1 in current SFN
- At subframe 8, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 4 in current SFN
Case 3 : UL/DL Configuration 2
In case of UL/DL Configuration 2, Ack/Nack response timing for the PDSCH that is received by UE is transmitted according to the following rule.
How do you interpret this table and DL/UL correlation ?
It says
- UE transmit Ack/Nack at subframe 2,7
- At subframe 2, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 4,5,6,8 in previous SFN
- At subframe 7, UE transmit Ack/Nack for PDSCH it received at subframe 9 in previous SFN and 0,1,3 in current SFN
Please try to do the same analysis for the remaining UL/DL Configuration on your own. It would be the best way for you to understand the meaning of the table clearly.
< ACK/NACK from eNB for PUSCH >
Case 1 : UL/DL Configuration 0
Case 2 : UL/DL Configuration 1
SR/DCI 0 Timing
The Time delay between SR(Scheduling Request) and DCI 0 is not clearly specified in 3GPP specification. So basically, NW can send DCI 0 in any available DL subframe after reception of SR, but depending on the eNodeB and Test Equipment some minimum time interval may be required.
DCI 0/PUSCH Timing
If UE recieves DCI 0 at subframe n, it should send PUSCH at subframe n + k where k is defined as follow. I will post some graphical explanation for this table later. Until then, give it a try on your own to understand this table.
36-213 V9.3.0 (2010-10) Table 8-2 k for TDD configurations 0-6
Issues with Debugging
What was your first impression about all the Ack-Nack report mechanism described above ?
My first impression was "So complicated !" and "So.. So.. So.. confusing".
Unfortunately.. there is more serious problem than the 'confusing things'. It is about troubleshooting issues.
Let's assume that you are using DL/UL Configuration 2. and suppose UE sent a NACK at Subframe 2.
How did you know whether the NACK is for PDSCH at subframe 4 or 5 or 6 or 8 ? (As you know, in FDD.. the answer is so simple since the ACK/NACK from the UE is always for the PDSCH that it received 4 subframe before. If it is FDD, the answer is supposed to be 'it is for PDSCH received at subframe 8 in previous SFN), but in TDD case it is different as you may guess.
Then how do you correlate the NACK to the specific PDSCH which caused the NACK. It is completely dependent on how much detailed information that your UE log or Network log provide. If UE log or Network log provide ACK/NACK information and HARQ process number for every subframe.. you can try following procedure.
i) First, check UCI info at specific SFN and subframe number (let's label this as 'SFN_n:Subframe_2') and locate the HARQ process number that caused NACK.
ii) Go to transmitted PDSCH list 'around' SFN_n:Subframe_2 (at this point, you would not know exactly which subframe you have to pin point out).
iii) Look through several subframes upwards and downwards to find the subframe that is marking the same HARQ process number as you got at step i). That is the subframe that caused NACK.
|
Ack/Nack Feedback Mode
As described above, in TDD LTE ibe subframe can transmit ACK/NACK for multiple subframe as shown below. In the following figure as an example, UE send ACK/NACK for 4 PDSCHs in subframe 2. What should eNB do if the subframe 2 send NACK ? Does it have to retransmit the whole 4 PDSCHs ? or transmit only PDSCH which is NACKed ?
The answer to the question gets different depending on tdd-AckNackFeedbackMode setting in RRC message (e.g, RRC Connection Setup or RRC Connection Reconfiguration).
If it is set to be 'bundling', eNB should retransmit all the PDSCH. If it is sent to be 'multiplexing', eNB should retransmit the only PDSCH which is NACKed.
Followings are some of the items that is worth noticing from 3GPP 36.213 10.1.3 TDD HARQ-ACK feedback procedures (I revised the statement a little bit to make it simple and hopefully clearer)
|
You would notice the variable 'M' in many of the statement above. M is defined to be "the number of elements in the set K defined in Table 10.1.3.1-1". Following examples would give you clearer idea on the meaning of M.
System Information Variation
No comments:
Post a Comment